Read the fictional case
Read the fictional case. Use fictional characters and a suitable tone for the group.
Investigate. Connect. Resolve.
A fictional, non-graphic investigation challenges teams to compare statements, motives and timelines, then argue for the explanation best supported by the evidence.
A fictional, non-graphic investigation challenges teams to compare statements, motives and timelines, then argue for the explanation best supported by the evidence.
Agree the mission rules and success criteria during the briefing, then let your team choose its approach.
A practical progression from the first decision to the final demonstration.
Read the fictional case. Use fictional characters and a suitable tone for the group.
Allocate evidence-review roles. Test the strongest alternative explanation.
Compare statements and timelines. Base conclusions on supplied evidence.
Challenge the leading explanation. Give each evidence-review role a voice in the discussion.
Present the case with supporting clues. Use fictional characters and a suitable tone for the group.
Use fictional characters and a suitable tone for the group.
Test the strongest alternative explanation.
Base conclusions on supplied evidence.
Give each evidence-review role a voice in the discussion.
Use the debrief to compare the team’s decisions with the final result. Discuss which information helped, where a handoff failed and what the team would do differently in a comparable workplace situation.
Plan Digital Murder Mystery around your participants, the available time and the decisions you want them to practise.
Group sizes and timings are planning guides. Equipment, technical depth and venue suitability are confirmed in the proposal.
Planning details for Digital Murder Mystery. Bring any additional requirements into your conversation with Sieger.
A fictional, non-graphic investigation challenges teams to compare statements, motives and timelines, then argue for the explanation best supported by the evidence.
The session progresses through these tasks: read the fictional case; allocate evidence-review roles; compare statements and timelines; challenge the leading explanation; present the case with supporting clues.
Use fictional characters and a suitable tone for the group. Test the strongest alternative explanation. Base conclusions on supplied evidence. Give each evidence-review role a voice in the discussion.
Use the debrief to compare the team’s decisions with the final result. Discuss which information helped, where a handoff failed and what the team would do differently in a comparable workplace situation.
Group size is agreed after reviewing the venue, available equipment and facilitation format. Share your expected numbers so the programme can be organised into suitable teams.
Duration is agreed in the proposal. The agenda should allow time for the briefing, challenge rounds, discussion and a closing debrief.
The proposed format uses fictional evidence pack, digital clue materials, shared evidence board, solution and hint guidance. Confirm devices, internet access and venue needs before booking.
Share the audience profile and any accessibility needs during planning. Task complexity, role allocation and support can be discussed to suit the participants.
The scenario, difficulty and discussion focus can be discussed around your objectives. Agree the final scope and any content requirements with Sieger before the event.
Send your preferred date, venue, participant count and objectives through the enquiry form. Mention Digital Murder Mystery so the team can discuss the relevant format.
Tell us what you have in mind. We will help you explore a programme that fits your people and your occasion.
Still finalising the details? Share what you know.
Every team is different. Share your people, purpose and preferred setting, and we’ll translate your brief into an experience designed to connect, engage and create lasting impact.
Share your brief and preferred contact details.
Choose an experience that connects your people, your purpose and the possibilities of technology.