Receive the scenario and resource budget
Review the simulated scenario and the time and material allowance.
Think. Build. Survive.
A multi-station STEM mission where teams solve engineering and science problems while managing limited resources.
Teams enter a simulated survival scenario with a finite resource bank. They must solve a sequence of STEM challenges and decide where to spend time and materials.
Agree the mission rules and success criteria during the briefing, then let your team choose its approach.
A practical progression from the first decision to the final demonstration.
Review the simulated scenario and the time and material allowance.
Choose an order of challenges that balances difficulty and potential progress.
Use the available STEM materials to complete the first station objective.
Review the remaining resource bank before committing to another approach.
Combine the completed tasks to reach the final scenario goal.
Track the material bank as the scenario develops.
Choose a challenge sequence with a clear rationale.
Combine different skills across the station tasks.
Decide where to invest time and resources before committing them.
The challenge turns a collection of small puzzles into a strategic team system where decisions early in the experience affect later performance.
Plan STEM Survival Challenge around your participants, the available time and the decisions you want them to practise.
Group sizes and timings are planning guides. Equipment, technical depth and venue suitability are confirmed in the proposal.
Planning details for STEM Survival Challenge. Bring any additional requirements into your conversation with Sieger.
The focus is cognitive and hands-on rather than athletic. Physical movement can be added through station design.
Yes. Survival can become expedition, disaster response, innovation lab or mission control.
Yes. Difficulty, narrative, scoring, team size, duration, venue layout and the workplace behaviour being explored can all be customised.
Yes. The experience can be combined with electronics, drones, robotics, STEM, software, AI and mechanical challenges to create a larger technology challenge journey.
The current planning format is 20–120 participants, organised into teams of 5–6. Confirm the final group size with Sieger so equipment, facilitator coverage and team rotations can be planned.
The indicative activity duration is 90 min. Briefing, practice, team presentations and debrief requirements can affect the final agenda; agree the complete session timing during planning.
The proposed kit includes STEM station kits, Resource tokens, Challenge cards, Measurement tools, and Score ledger. Confirm the final equipment list, participant devices and venue requirements with the programme team.
The existing format is designed with leadership teams, large corporate groups, young leaders, cross-functional teams in mind. Share participants’ experience levels so the technical depth and facilitation can be matched to the group.
The facilitator can use the agreed challenge rules, team decisions and observed results to guide the debrief. The discussion connects resource management, strategic thinking, collaboration to situations your team encounters at work.
Send your preferred date, location, participant count and learning objective through the enquiry form or call +91 98400 97567. Sieger can discuss the suitable format, equipment, venue needs and proposal.
Tell us what you have in mind. We will help you explore a programme that fits your people and your occasion.
Still finalising the details? Share what you know.
Every team is different. Share your people, purpose and preferred setting, and we’ll translate your brief into an experience designed to connect, engage and create lasting impact.
Share your brief and preferred contact details.
Choose an experience that connects your people, your purpose and the possibilities of technology.